2006
BAKER FORUM PANEL DISCUSSION
Challenges
and Opportunities
for the U.S. and California
in the Transition to a "Post-Oil" World
Background
The
Baker Forum’s mission is to bring together education
and industry leaders in an ongoing dialogue to address issues
of critical importance to United States leadership in science
and technology and to identify creative higher education responses.
Envisioned as a biennial event, the Baker Forum provides an
issue-focused, highly interactive setting, designed to promote
broad dialogue, to highlight issues that are important to
the future of polytechnic and science and technology universities
(PS&T), and to stimulate creative responses.
Panel
Convener Richard F. Hartung
Chair, Cal Poly President’s Cabinet
Panel
Moderator - R. Thomas Jones
Dean, College of Architecture and Environmental Design
California Polytechnic State University
Panelists
A
panel of four experts has been invited to consider challenges
and opportunities for the U.S. and California in the transition
to a "post-oil" world.
•
Martha Krebs, Deputy Director for Research and Development
California Energy Commission
•
Linda K. Trocki, Bechtel Fellow and Project Manager
Bechtel National, Inc.
•
Paul J. Turinsky, Professor, Department of Nuclear
Engineering
North Carolina State University
•
Jan Hamrin, President
Center for Resource Solutions
Panel
Format
The
panelists will delineate the global, national, and state context;
highlight specific issues; and suggest possible strategies
for subsequent discussion in breakout sessions.
R. Thomas Jones,
Cal Poly’s Dean of Architecture and Environmental Design,
is the moderator of the panel. He will conduct the panel in
a town hall format that will facilitate interaction among
the panelists and with the invited participants.
The discussion
will be organized in the following manner:
• Each of
the panelists will be asked to share opening remarks.
• After all the panelists have shared remarks, the moderator
will pose follow-up questions.
• Questions will be invited from the audience.
Panel
Topics
The
following topics are among those to be addressed by the panelists:
Martha
Krebs, Deputy Director for Research and Development
California Energy Commission
1. The energy situation
in California
2. Trends in California energy policy
3. Research trends:
• Research at the intersection of renewables, transmission,
and energy storage
• Research around the water/energy nexus
• Research regarding climate change
• Research regarding building efficiency appliance standards
(zero energy, new homes)
Linda
K. Trocki, Bechtel Fellow and Project Manager
Bechtel National, Inc.
1. Incentives to
industry to invest in sustainable energy solutions
2. Selected energy alternatives:
• transportation fuels from agricultural products
• coal gasification and CO2 sequestration
3. Potential solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
4. Potential related points include:
• built environment implications/options
• additional transportation options (e.g., fuel cells
for cars, further development of rail transportation)
Paul J. Turinsky, Professor, Department of
Nuclear Engineering
North Carolina State University
1. The global nuclear
energy partnership
2. Issues of sustainability in the nuclear energy field
3. Proliferation assistance
4. Hydrogen economy and the related role of high-temperature
reactors
Jan
Hamrin, President
Center for Resource Solutions
1. Renewables at
the global level:
• The big picture of renewables in the world, nation
and state
• Comparison of California, China, and other international
targets
2. Renewables at the local level - examples of practical solutions:
• Green buildings – Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) program
• Corporation/business strategies to reduce greenhouse
gas footprint
• Manufacturers of consumer goods: the "Made with
Renewables Energy" Green-e logo
Panel
Discussion Questions
The
following questions are among those to be considered by the
panelists:
1. How would you
characterize current public opinion about energy issues and
energy choices? How does this compare with the period of the
last "energy crisis" in the l970s?
2. What kind of
public consensus and technical approaches are found in other
industrialized nations? Is any of this applicable to the United
States or California?
3. Do you think
the media is adequately and accurately covering the issue
and possible technical solutions?
4. Which organizations
or associations are working with the full spectrum of stakeholders
and interest groups to generate policy consensus or technical
advances?
5. What should
our K-12 and university educators be doing to foster better
public awareness and understanding around the issues and the
alternative solutions?
6. What role can
Cal Poly, as a polytechnic and predominantly undergraduate
university, play in fostering awareness; advancing knowledge;
and engaging in technical applied research?
|